Historian Did Hitler Have Reason To Hate The JewsHistory Articles, Holocaust Hype Articles, How The Jews Prompted A German Backlash HISTORIAN DID HITLER HAVE REASON TO HATE THE JEWSBy Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2. Articles May Be Reproduced Only With Authorship of Br Nathanael Kapner Link To Real Zionist NewsSMPlease Help Support This Site Or Send Your Contribution To Brother Nathanael Kapner PO Box 5. Priest River ID 8. E mail bronathanaelyahoo. For The Best. Alternative News Coverage. WebRoot/Store22/Shops/55896b73-ec04-4a41-ad16-3dc9d17db74e/59FA/F604/1E26/2519/5115/0A48/365C/0CE8/Boosie_Badazz_-_Touch_Down_m.png' alt='Lord Infamous The Man The Myth The Legacy Zip' title='Lord Infamous The Man The Myth The Legacy Zip' />CLICK Rense. HereRESPECTED HISTORIAN RALF GEORG REUTH ARGUES THAT HITLER may have had a real reason to hate the Jews. Noted for his breadth of knowledge on World Wars I and II and its prominent figures, German historian Reuth has enjoyed much acclaim for his numerous books covering the World Wars era. In his new 2. 00. Hitlers Jewish Hatred Cliche and Reality, Ralf Georg Reuth recounts that Hitler blamed the Jews for both the collapse of the German economy and the Russian revolution. See Hitlers Judenhass Klischee und Wirklichkeit Purchase Here. Drawing on numerous archives, Reuth paints the social backdrop during Adolf Hitlers rise to power. Almost half of all German private banks were Jewish owned, writes Reuth, the stock exchange was dominated by Jewish stockbrokers, and almost half of the nations newspapers were Jewish run as were 8. Reuths groundbreaking book was reviewed in the June 1. Londons The Daily Mail in an article entitled, Has Historian Finally Discovered Real Reason For Hitlers Hatred Of JewsOf particular note is one of the comments attached to the article made by a British subscriber regarding Jewish influence in Pre WWII Germany I thought this was all fairly obvious. Indeed, Jewish control of the banks, the stockmarket, the press and commerce, is fairly obvious BUT to state this obvious fact OUT LOUD will have all the Jews breathing down our necks crying, Anti Semitism Thank God that finally a historian with repute among the general public has no fear of Jewish attempts to censor the truth. Golden Tee 99 Manual. HITLER THE JEWISH STAB IN THE BACKBLAMING THE LOSS OF WORLD WAR I ON JEWISH FINANCIERS and the budding Weimar Republic at home, writes Ralf Georg Reuth, Hitler subscribed to the Stab In The Back theory which was growing in popularity in Germany in 1. The Stab In The Back theory attributed Germanys losing the war not to military defeat on the battlefield, but to the intentional sabotaging of the war effort by Jewish financiers, socialists, and international Bolsheviks. Hitler would later blame Jewish journalists who fled Nazi Germany for inciting belligerence against Germany leading to WWII. To Hitler and many others, it was left liberal politicians and supporters, German Jewish bankers and their international Jewish network, of the Weimar Republic who stabbed Germany in the back by signing the armistice on November 1. They would soon become known as the November Criminals. HITLER INCLUDED IN HIS LISTof November Criminals, the international Jewish bankers who financed and controlled the Weimar Republic. These Jewish bankers operated both out of Frankfort, known as the mother city of Jewish bankers, and abroad. Frankfort produced its Rothschilds, Lazards, Warburgs, Dreyfuses, Seifs, as well as sending to New York, Jacob Schiff, an agent for Walter Rothschild. The Jews of Germany, Marvin Lowenthal, 1. Thus, the Stab in the Back theory became hugely popular among Germans who found it impossible to swallow defeat. During the war, Adolf Hitler became obsessed with this idea, especially laying blame on Jews and Marxists in Germany for undermining the war effort. HITLER AND THE JEWISH COMMUNISTSWITH WORLD WAR ONE LOSTand Germany in financial ruin, Hitler came to view the Jews as solely responsible for the growth of Bolshevism, writes Reuth. In his book, Reuth quotes Nobel prize winning novelist, Thomas Mann, who equated the Bolshevik revolution in Russia with the Jews. Continuing, Reuth writes When a Soviet Republic Munchner Raterepublik was declared briefly in Munich in 1. Hitler to point to the Jews as bearing responsibility for the nations ills. Hitler saw that many German Jews played prominent roles in the growing communist movement, which was against everything Hitler the nationalist stood for. Two events Germanys defeat of the war due to Jewish financial intrigues together with the Russian revolution and its threat to Germany shaped Hitlers views of Jews and his subsequent plan to rid Germany of them all. View Entire Story. Here. A defining moment in the political formation of Adolf Hitler, was the January 1. So far, 2017 hasnt given us much to look at, unless you enjoy watching protracted dumpster fires. So, of course, the logical thing to do is to look back. Ten years. For the first time since 2011, weve got a final that appears to have some legitimate bad blood. The Penguins walloped the Predators 60 to take a 32 series lead. Yahoo Lifestyle is your source for style, beauty, and wellness, including health, inspiring stories, and the latest fashion trends. WebRoot/Store22/Shops/55896b73-ec04-4a41-ad16-3dc9d17db74e/59F2/75F9/575C/2ABE/85C2/0A48/365C/8A24/Mac_Dre_-_Mac_Dammit_And_Friends_m.jpg' alt='Lord Infamous The Man The Myth The Legacy Zip' title='Lord Infamous The Man The Myth The Legacy Zip' />Spartacus Uprising Spartakusaufstand in Berlin. The prominent figure in the uprising was the communist Jew, Rosa Luxemburg. Luxemburg, along with other left wing Jews including Karl Liebknecht, founded the socialist Spartacus League Spartakusbund in 1. Sports journalists and bloggers covering NFL, MLB, NBA, NHL, MMA, college football and basketball, NASCAR, fantasy sports and more. News, photos, mock drafts, game. New video has surfaced that shows a man drawing a gun and opening fire at counter protesters during the neoNazi protest in Charlottesville on August 12th. The man. Speedrunner Calebhart42 was playing Mega Man X4 at the 2017 Smash The Record event when he got to one of the games more infamous cutscenes and it started to skip. Luke Plunkett. Luke Plunkett is a Contributing Editor based in Canberra, Australia. He has written a book on cosplay, designed a game about airplanes, and also runs. In the following rare and exclusive interview, Sergio discusses his life in bodybuilding and relays never before published aspects of his various careers from. During the war, Luxemburg drafted the Spartacus programme, Leitsatze, which called upon socialists to turn the nationalist conflict in Germany into a revolutionary war with international consequences. View Entire Story. Here Here. THE LESSON FOR TODAYWHILE NOT ADVOCATING VIOLENCE against any specific group, a solution to the Jewish Question must be arrived at. For as Reuth points out, and it is certainly applicable today, Pre WWII Germany saw a tremendous rise of Jewish influence in every sphere of its societal infrastructure. This overwhelming Jewish influence is indeed the situation we now find ourselves in today both in America and in Europe. The question remains, What can we do about this preponderance of Jewish influenceJews are the most organized power bloc in the world. Thus, to combat Jewish supremacy, Gentiles must ALSO become an organized power bloc. The Jewish occupied media have convinced the Gentiles that the one organization that can oppose them, the historic Christian Church, not the Zionist Protestant innovation, is an institution to be shunned. Thus, many Gentiles will say, I dont believe in organized religion. This is a piece of Jewish brainwashing exactly what the Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion planned. But Jews do believe in organized religion, their own synagogue. The synagogue of the Jews is called in the Bible, The Synagogue of Satan. The Church, however, the Bible calls, The New Jerusalem, that is, The City of Peace. Thus, if Gentiles, who once loved going to Church, can get organized, whether in Church buildings, home groups, or foundations, they can STOP the Jews from taking over America and all the nations that host them. For More See How The Jews Prompted A German Backlash. Click Here. And Germanys Forbidden Words. Click Here. And Neo Nazi Rise In Germany Frightens Jews. Click Here. And Jewish Bankers Their Agenda. Click Here. And Jewrys Scheme For World Domination. Yesterday I Was. Click Here. And The Jewish Question Is Now A Global Issue. Click Here. And Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion Fulfilled Click Here. CLICK Brother Nathanael Street EvangelistPlease Help Support This Site Or Send Your Contribution To Brother Nathanael Kapner PO Box 5. Priest River ID 8. E mail bronathanaelyahoo. Brother Nathanael July 5, 2. The True Story of the Koh i Noor DiamondAnd Why the British Wont Give It Back. History. The diamond came from Indias alluvial mines thousands of years ago, sifted from the sand. According to Hindu belief, it was revered by gods like Krishnaeven though it seemed to carry a curse, if the luck of its owners was anything to go by. The gem, which would come to be known as the Koh i Noor Diamond, wove its way through Indian court intrigues before eventually ending up in the British Crown Jewels by the mid 1. That was when a British amateur geologist interviewed gemologists and historians on the diamonds origins and wrote the history of the Koh i Noor that served as the basis for most future stories of the diamond. Coduto Foundation Design Pdf'>Coduto Foundation Design Pdf. But according to historians Anita Anand and William Dalrymple, that geologist got it all wrong. We found what every historian longs for, Dalrymple says. A story which is incredibly important to people, an object known around the world, but which is all built on a structure of myth. In their new book Koh i Noor The History of the Worlds Most Infamous Diamond, Anand and Dalrymple work their way through more than four centuries of Indian history to learn the truth about the diamond, panning the old research like the Indians who sieved river sand for diamonds, Anand says. And the true history has its share of drama. For Dalrymple, Its a perfectly scripted Game of Thrones style epic. All the romance, all the blood, all the gore, all the bling. But beneath the drama of the diamond is a more serious question that still has no clear answer How should modern nations deal with a colonial legacy of lootingWith numerous countries including India, Pakistan and the Taliban in Afghanistan having claimed ownership of the Koh i Noor, its a topic under vigorous debate. To understand where the diamond came fromand whether it could ever go backrequires diving into the murky past, when India was ruled by outsiders the Mughals. On the Gemstone Throne. Nader Shah on the Peacock Throne, whose jewels included the Koh i Noor diamond. Wikimedia CommonsFor centuries, India was the worlds only source of diamondsall the way until 1. Brazil. Most of the gemstones were alluvial, meaning they could be sifted out of river sands, and rulers of the subcontinent embraced their role as the first diamond connoisseurs. In many ancient Indian courts, jewelry rather than clothing was the principle form of adornment and a visible sign of court hierarchy, with strict rules being laid down to establish which rank of courtier could wear which gem in which setting, Dalrymple and Anand write in their book. The worlds oldest texts on gemology also come from India, and they include sophisticated classification systems for different kinds of stones. Turco Mongol leader Zahir ud din Babur came from Central Asia through the Kyber Pass located between modern day Afghanistan and Pakistan to invade India in 1. Islamic Mughal dynasty and a new era of infatuation with gemstones. The Mughals would rule northern India for 3. India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and eastern Afghanistan, all the while reveling in the mountains of gemstones they inherited and pillaged. Although its impossible to know exactly where the Koh i Noor came from and when it first came into the Mughals possession, there is a definite point at which it appears in the written record. In 1. 62. 8, Mughal ruler Shah Jahan commissioned a magnificent, gemstone encrusted throne. The bejeweled structure was inspired by the fabled throne of Solomon, the Hebrew king who figures into the histories of Islam, Judaism and Christianity. Shah Jahans throne took seven years to make, costing four times as much as the Taj Mahal, which was also under construction. As court chronicler Ahmad Shah Lahore writes in his account of the throne The outside of the canopy was to be of enamel work studded with gems, the inside was to be thickly set with rubies, garnets, and other jewels, and it was to be supported by emerald columns. On top of each pillar there were to be two peacocks thick set with gems, and between each of the two peacocks a tree set with rubies and diamonds, emeralds and pearls. Among the many precious stones that adorned the throne were two particularly enormous gems that would, in time, become the most valued of all the Timur Rubymore highly valued by the Mughals because they preferred colored stonesand the Koh i Noor diamond. The diamond was lodged at the very top of the throne, in the head of a glistening gemstone peacock. For a century after the creation of the Peacock Throne, the Mughal Empire retained its supremacy in India and beyond. It was the wealthiest state in Asia Delhi, the capital city, was home to 2 million people, more than London and Paris combined. But that prosperity attracted the attention of other rulers in Central Asia, including Persian ruler Nader Shah. When Nader invaded Delhi in 1. Nader left the city accompanied by so much gold and so many gems that the looted treasure required 7. Aladdin was Disney ized embellishment. Nader took the Peacock Throne as part of his treasure, but removed the Timur Ruby and the Koh i Noor diamond to wear on an armband. The Koh i Noor would remain away from Indiain a country that would become Afghanistanfor 7. It passed between the hands of various rulers in one blood soaked episode after another, including a king who blinded his own son and a deposed ruler whose shaved head was coronated with molten gold. With all the fighting between Central Asian factions, a power vacuum grew in Indiaand the British soon came to take advantage of it. The Boy King and the British Crown. An illustration of the Koh i Noor diamond center, as it was worn before being signed over to the British. Wikimedia CommonsAt the turn of the 1. British East India Company expanded its territorial control from coastal cities to the interior of the India subcontinent. As Dalrymple and Anand write of the British campaigns, they would ultimately annex more territory than all of Napoleons conquests in Europe. In addition to claiming more natural resources and trading posts, the British also had their eye on a piece of priceless treasure the Koh i Noor. After decades of fighting, the diamond returned to India and came into the hands of Sikh ruler Ranjit Singh in 1. It was not just that Ranjit Singh liked diamonds and respected the stones vast monetary value the gem seems to have held a far greater symbolism for him, write Anand and Dalrymple. He had won back from the Afghan Durrani dynasty almost all the Indian lands they had seized since the time of Ahmad Shah who plundered Delhi in 1. For Anand, Singhs elevation of the diamond was a major turning point in its history. The transition is startling when the diamond becomes a symbol of potency rather than beauty, Anand says. It becomes this gemstone like the ring in Lord of the Rings, one ring to rule them all. For the British, that symbol of prestige and power was irresistible. If they could own the jewel of India as well as the country itself, it would symbolize their power and colonial superiority. It was a diamond worth fighting and killing for, now more than ever. When the British learned of Ranjit Singhs death in 1. Hindu priests, the British press exploded in outrage. The richest, the most costly gem in the known world, has been committed to the trust of a profane, idolatrous and mercenary priesthood, wrote one anonymous editorial.